Users: 64: Computers: 29: Different versions: 3: Total Keys: 156: Total Clicks: 1,484: Total Usage: 6 hours, 59 minutes, 25 seconds: Average Usage: 6 minutes, 33. Fritz chess benchmark.exe File Download and Fix For Windows OS, dll File and exe file download. Fritz Chess Benchmark. ChessBase, Fritz. Fritz Chess Benchmark.exe. SpecialBuild- This file can be used in the following paths. Fritz Chess Benchmark.exe, MD5:b45d60dd386b5e55b8d178, - VirSCAN.org - free virus scan is a free online scan service, utilizing various anti-virus programs.
TopicThe Rybka Lounge / Computer Chess / RYZEN FRITZ CHESS BENCHMARKS ???
Fritz Chess Benchmark 4.3.2 Download
does anybody here have already ryzen cpus?
could you share your fritz benchmarks with SMT DISABLED? PLS??
http://immortalchess.net/forum/showpost.php?p=753335&postcount=576 , i think is good
Fritz Chessbench (MT, points)
22981 , Intel Core i7-6900K (8c/16t) 20495 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 20495 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X SMT on 15484 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X SMT off vor 7 Stunden
The 6900k is double the price.
The 1800x even on early bios is doing very well indeed.
I made some little tests and posted them in a German forum (sorry, I'm too lazy to translate):
https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f11/ryzen-schach-performance-bmi2-problem-1156117.html#post25368941 These results were made with only one run to depth 30/31 just to get an impression. The results make clear there is a problem with bmi2 compiles - they should be avoided. But overall chess performance isn't bad. ![]()
You going for dual socket naples when they come out?
Probably yes, but depends on the costs.
I'm starting to think Icelake might have some improvements in it if Intel feels threatened.
BygsgsDate 2017-03-17 12:52Edited 2017-03-17 12:59
![]()
translation :
Ryzen Chess Performance - BMI2 Problem For the comparison AMD Ryzen against Intel Skylake I have carried out the following tests: Hardware Intel: Xeon E3-1245v5 on MSI C236A Workstation with 2x 8GB Samsung DDR4 ECC 2133 Hardware AMD: Ryzen 1800X on Asus Prime B350 plus with 2x 8 GB Crucial DDR4 2133 Both run on load on all logical cores at 3.7 GHz Result: Engine Intel AMD difference Komodo 10.3 7,75 Mn/s 14,86 Mn/s 92% asmFishW_2017_02_15_popcnt 10,60 Mn/s 19,21 Mn/s 81% asmFishW_2017_02_15_bmi2 10,91 Mn/s 14,25 Mn/s 31% Stockfish_8_x64_popcnt 8,36 Mn/s 16,51 Mn/s 97% Stockfish_8_x64_bmi2 8,69 Mn/s 12,36 Mn/s 42% For these results, an inaccuracy of a few percent is in each case, since chess engines running multi-threaded do not work deterministically. There are different compiler options - the popcnt versions use the valuable instruction POPCNT from the instruction set SSE 4.2. With a command count how many farmers are on the field. The bmi2 versions also use the BMI2 instruction set. This should improve the performance actually - with Intel folds also, as one can see from the results. Ryzen seems to be a serious problem. Edit: In the single-thread mode (since the Ryzen runs to 4.1 GHz), the following results are obtained: Stockfish_8_x64_popcnt 1.591 Mn / s, Stockfish_8_x64_bmi2 1.156 Mn / s. These results are, by the way, extremely accurate - in single-thread mode the results are deterministic. So 27.3% performance loss through the BMI2 option. I myself wrote a small tool in C ++, which automatically sets affinities automatically optimally - regardless of the number of cores. I use this for years - and have it adapted yesterday, that it also SMT at AMD correctly named. AffPri.png The chess engines are usually controlled by a GUI. A freeware GUI is e.g. Arena: Arena Chess GUI for Linux and Windows - Welcome to Arena You can also start the engine by clicking on it and then enter text commands that correspond to the UCI protocol. A sequence of instructions, e.g. like this: setoption name threads value 8 setoption name hash value 2048 go depth 30 Means: use 8 threads, 2048 MB hash, calculate the position (without input basic) up to a depth of 30 units. The result is then time **** (consumed milliseconds), nps (nodes per second - the required performance value), nodes (the total number of calculated nodes = positions) and score (evaluation of the position in cp = centipawns = 1 / 100 pawns With my new Asrock AB350 Pro4 it is now possible to switch off SMT. With a 1700X there are the following values (everything asmFishW - the CPU runs under load to 3.5 GHz): popcnt Version: 13,48 Mn/s onhe SMT bmi2 Version: 9,41 Mn/s so, it should be clear that it's no SMT problem AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 16 Threads, all threads @3.7GHz, Asus Prime X370-Pro: Popcnt: 18.215.946nps, 8cp, 2.118.569.234n, g1f3 e7e6 18.307.576nps, 24cp, 1.232.887.103n, d2d4 e7e6 18.275.286nps, 6cp, 1.650.093.853n, d2d4 g8f6 18.279.639nps, 7cp, 2.532.077.382n, e2e4 e7e6 18.244.647nps, 14cp, 1.976.132.497n, d2d4 e7e6 Intel i7-7700K, 8 Threads, all threads @5.0GHz, Asus Prime Z270-A: Popcnt: 12.830.001nps, 5cp, 1.148.002.859n, d2d4 g8f6 12.890.656nps, 17cp, 1.268.621.023n, d2d4 e7e6 12.839.685nps, 11cp, 1.334.903.602n, d2d4 e7e6 12.825.199nps, 10cp, 1.358.714.454n, d2d4 g8f6 12.834.243nps, 20cp, 1.790.710.651n, d2d4 g8f6 upgrade-bundle for old PCs : C-Power-Bundle AMD Ryzen 7 1700. 16GB RAM DDR4 PC2400. ASRock AB350 PRO4 AM4. 8x3,00GHz(Turbo 3,70Ghz) AM4. EUR 659.52 including shipping Fritz Chess Benchmark 4.5
@Lukas..have you tried the Base version..possible it will go even faster then popcnt version?!
JP.
The base version is slower.
Okay,Thanks..
Fritz Chess Benchmark Official
Going for two AMD EPYC 7281s for $1200 looks like a nice price point for the 16c/32T cpu. In tandum $1200 bucks for 32C/64T! And I bet whatever board I put them in they will be at least as fast as a 2x e5-2697v4 and without the $2000/per cpu price tag LOL
Hi gsgs:
What does 'SMT' mean?
AMD SMT= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simultaneous_multithreading
Fritz Chessbench (MT, points)
22981 , Intel Core i7-6900K (8c/16t) 20495 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 20495 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X SMT on 15484 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X SMT off vor 7 Stunden Thanks for the SMP url. It is unclear from gsgs' tests whether SMT helps chess performance since 20495 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 20495 , AMD Ryzen 7 1800X SMT on How is SMT turned on: in the BIOS?
TopicThe Rybka Lounge / Computer Chess / RYZEN FRITZ CHESS BENCHMARKS ???
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill
Chess is an ancient game but despite its old age it is immensely popular with people around the world. It can be played by nearly anyone and anywhere as all it takes is a chessboard and then pieces. Although chess may look like an easy game, the reality is that it is not as there are billions and billions of legal moves. This is the reason why chess is used in modern computers both for playing and for benchmarking processors. Fritz Chess Benchmark 4.2 is a software tool that measures the power of your CPU by running chess algorithms and then compares it to the performance of a 1 GHz Pentium III processor in this benchmark.
Features
Chess Benchmark
Fritz Chess Benchmark is a rather simple benchmarking tool unlike the chess game. The program is free, portable and easy to use as all it takes is to run it and then click on the Start button. After some time you will get your results and you can compare them to the hypothetical 1 GHz Pentium III chip used as a reference in the program or compare them with friends to see who has the stronger processor in this benchmark.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |